Appendix E1: Iteration Designs

Details for previous iterations and material comparison can be found in the Interim Report.

First Iteration: All components on the same side of PCB, covered by 1 shield. Problems: Not enough space for all components.

Iteration 1

Fig E1-1. First Iteration

Second Iteration: Shielded and unshielded components on opposite sides of the same PCB. Problems: Close proximity of high and low voltage components.

Iteration 2

Fig E1-2. Second Iteration

Third Iteration: PCBs for high and low voltage components. Shielded components on the inside of middle shielding. Problem: Thin structures (on the outside of pin stacks) which were vulnerable to vibrations and stress.

Iteration 3

Fig E1-3. Third Iteration

Final Iteration: Optimised design from 3rd iteration.

Final Iteration

Appendix E2: CAD Models

CAD Model Top View

Fig E2-1. Top View

CAD Model Bottom View

Fig E2-2. Bottom View

CAD Model Side View

Fig E2-3. Side View

CAD Model Isometric View

Fig E2-4. Isometric View

CAD Model Isometric without Central Shielding

Fig E2-5. Isometric View without Central Shielding

Inner Side of High Voltage PCB

Fig E2-6. Inner Side of High Voltage PCB

Inner Side of Low Voltage PCB

Fig E2-7. Inner Side of Low Voltage PCB

Appendix E3: Material Choice Summary

Details of the materials can be found in the Interim Report.

Material Pros Cons
PEEK
  • Very available
  • Light compared to metals at 1.32g/cm^3 (Curbell plastics, n.d.)
  • Radiation Resistant (Ensinger, n.d.)
  • Does not have strong shielding properties without high Z materials added as composite. (Khozemy et al., 2022)
PEEK infused with heavy atoms
  • Strong shielding properties. (Khozemy et al., 2022)
  • Unavailable and expensive. (Khozemy et al., 2022)
Aluminium 6061
  • Very available
  • Only shields alpha and beta particles. (IMS Team, n.d.)
Concrete
  • Strong shielding properties. (IMS Team, n.d.) (Onaizi et al, 2024)
  • Heavy and brittle (Onaizi et al, 2024)
Lead
  • Strong shielding properties. (IMS Team, n.d.)
  • Environmental unfriendly (Sampson, n.d.)
  • Heavy
Table E3-1. Material Comparison

Appendix E4: Radiation Experiment Data

Radiation Experiment Data

Fig E4-1. GM Counters

GM Tube Specs

Fig E4-2. GM Tube Specs

Background radiation can fluctuate from 20 to 100 CPM. (Link)

Each reading is 30 minutes. We first check whether the two counters are calibrated. A total of 7 readings are taken, with both GM Counters left outside.

No. Counter A Counter B
1 2598 2613
2 2612 2542
3 2586 2576
4 2624 2710
5 2655 2453
6 2587 2573
7 2534 2474
Avg 2599.43 2563.00
CPM 86.64761905 85.43333333
Table E4-1. GM Counter Readings

The counters are calibrated and have very close values.

GM Counters and aluminium boxes

Fig E4-3. GM Counters and Aluminium Boxes

Next we put Counter A inside the box and Counter B outside the box and take the reading. We swap the two counters and take the readings again to average out any errors from their differences. Then we repeat for different thicknesses.

Raw Data Counter A Counter B   Counter A Counter B  
Thickness Inside Box (1) Inside Box (2) Inside Box (Average) Outside Box (1) Outside Box (2) Outside Box (Average)
0mm 2598 2576 2587 2613 2586 2599.5
2mm 2480 2428 2454 2496 2613 2554.5
4mm 2247 2448 2347.5 2526 2579 2552.5
6mm 2294 2262 2278 2596 2635 2615.5
8mm 2258 2247 2252.5 2600 2548 2574
10mm 2093 2079 2086 2557 2629 2593
Table E4-2. Counter Data

We collect more data.

Raw Data Counter A Counter B   Counter A Counter B  
Thickness Inside Box (1) Inside Box (2) Inside Box (Average) Outside Box (1) Outside Box (2) Outside Box (Average)
0mm 2547 2554 2550.5 2534 2572 2553
2mm 2467 2429 2448 2578 2497 2537.5
4mm 2389 2401 2395 2562 2554 2558
6mm 2212 2365 2288.5 2510 2520 2515
8mm 2176 2260 2218 2496 2495 2495.5
10mm 2116 2230 2173 2470 2396 2433
Table E4-3. Counter Data

We tabulate the data below.

Thickness (mm) Inside Box CPM Outside Box CPM Absolute Difference (CPM) Percentage Drop
0 2573.7 85.79 2576.3 85.88 0.09 0.10%
2 2458.3 81.94 2546.0 84.87 2.92 3.44%
4 2361.3 78.71 2555.3 85.18 6.46 7.59%
6 2256.0 75.20 2565.3 85.51 10.31 12.06%
8 2227.0 74.23 2534.8 84.49 10.26 12.14%
10 2129.5 70.98 2513.0 83.77 12.78 15.26%
Table E4-4. Counter Data Analysis

Graph is plotted. It plateaus after 6mm.

Counter Data Analysis

Fig E4-4. Counter Data Analysis

Appendix E5: Bill of Materials and Mass Budget

Item Material Manufacturing Method Mass (g) Number of Counts Total Mass (g)
Top Shielding Aluminum 6061 CNC 47.5 1 47.5
Bottom Shielding Aluminum 6061 CNC 54.5 1 54.5
Middle Shielding Aluminum 6061 CNC 138.0 1 138.0
HV PCB (Soldered) FR4 Bought 56.0 1 56.0
LV PCB (Soldered) FR4 Bought 60.0 1 60.0
Bolts Stainless Steel Bought 3.0 4 12.0
Spacer Stainless Steel Bought 0.5 10 5.0
Pin Stacks Plastic and Copper Bought 6.5 2 13.0
Thermal Interface Material Thermal Interface Material Bought - - -
Total         386.0
Table E5-1. Bill of Materials

The precision of the scale was 0.5 grams. The mass of the full module is 388.5g.

Weighing

Fig E5-1. Weighing

Appendix E6: Physical Parameters

Height: 48.0mm Length and Breadth: 96.39mm by 94.33mm

Physical Parameters Physical Parameters
Fig E6-1 and E6-2. Physical Parameters

Centre of Gravity: X = 43.39mm Y = 48.03mm Z = -14.22mm

Centre of Gravity Centre of Gravity
Fig E6-3 and E6-4. Centre of Gravity

Moment of Inertia (at CG):

Lxx = 387471.00 Lxy = 15000.87 Lxz = 16132.16
Lyx = 15000.87 Lyy = 397053.44 Lyz = 23131.01
Lzx = 16132.16 Lzy = 23131.01 Lzz = 648808.59
Table E6-1. Moment of Inertia

Moment of Inertia

Fig E6-5. Moment of Inertia

Appendix E7: Jig Drawing

Jig CAD

Fig E7-1. Jig CAD

Jig Drawing

Fig E7-2. Jig Drawing

Note: There was some mistake by the manufacturer. In this drawing, the central hole is missing and the M3 holes were mirrored. The mistakes were subsequently fixed.

Appendix E8: Test Profiles

Test profiles are taken from SpaceX.

Sine Profile: (1.25x MPE)

Axial

Sine Profile Axial

Fig E8-1. Sine Profile Axial
  • Frequency range: 5 Hz to 100 Hz.
  • Acceleration levels:
    • 5Hz: ±0.5g * 1.25 = ±0.625g.
    • 20Hz: ±0.8g * 1.25 = ±1.00g
    • Peaks at ±0.9g * 1.25 = ±1.125g at 100 Hz.
No. Description Time
1 Start at 5Hz and 0.625g amplitude -
2 Increase frequency from 5Hz to 20Hz at a rate of 2 oct/min, increase amplitude linearly from 0.625g to 1.00g at 20Hz 60 seconds
3 Increase frequency from 20Hz to 35Hz at a rate of 2 oct/min, amplitude remain at 1.00g About 24.2 seconds
4 At the end of step 3, drop amplitude to 0.75g -
5 Increase frequency from 35Hz to 75Hz at a rate of 2 oct/min, amplitude remain at 0.75g About 33.0 seconds
6 Increase frequency from 75Hz to 85Hz at a rate of 2 oct/min, increase amplitude linearly from 0.75g to 1.125g at 85Hz About 5.41 seconds
7 Increase frequency from 85Hz to 100Hz at a rate of 4 oct/min, amplitude remain at 1.125g About 7.02 seconds
8 Repeat steps 1 to 7 one more time About 130 seconds
9 End -
Table E8-1. Sine Profile Axial

Total: about 260 seconds

Lateral

Sine Profile Lateral

Fig E8-2. Sine Profile Lateral
  • Frequency range: 5 Hz to 100 Hz
  • Acceleration levels:
    • Constant ±0.5 * 1.25 = 0.625g between 5 Hz and 85 Hz.
    • Peaks at ±0.6 * 1.25 = 0.75g at 100 Hz.
No. Description Time
1 Start at 5Hz and 0.625g amplitude -
2 Increase frequency from 5Hz to 85Hz at a rate of 2 oct/min, amplitude remain at 0.625g About 120.6 seconds
3 Increase frequency from 85Hz to 100Hz at a rate of 2 oct/min, increase amplitude linearly from 0.625g to 0.75g at 85Hz About 7.04 seconds
4 Repeat steps 1 to 3 one more time About 130 seconds
5 Repeat steps 1 to 4 for the other lateral axis About 260 seconds
6 End -
Table E8-2. Sine Profile Lateral

Total: about 520 seconds

Random

Random Profile

Fig E8-3. Random Profile

All axes: Require +6dB (using Falcon)

Random Profile

Fig E8-4. Random Profile
No. Description Time
1 Vibrate from 20Hz to 100Hz with constant 0.0264 g^2/Hz 20s
2 Increase vibration from 100Hz with 0.0264 g^2/Hz to 300Hz with 0.04 g^2/Hz 20s
3 Vibrate from 300Hz to 700Hz with constant 0.04 g^2/Hz 20s
4 Increase vibration from 700Hz with 0.04 g^2/Hz to 800Hz with 0.12 g^2/Hz 20s
5 Vibrate from 800Hz to 925Hz with constant 0.12 g^2/Hz 20s
6 Decrease vibration from 925Hz with 0.12 g^2/Hz to 2000Hz with 0.03864 g^2/Hz 20s
7 Repeat steps 1 to 6 two more times 240s
8 Repeat steps 1 to 7 for the other two axes. 720s
9 End -
Table E8-3. Random Profile

Total: about 1080 seconds

Thermal Cycling

No. Description Specification
1 Starting Temp Room Temperature (assume 20°C)
2 High Peak Temperature 70°C
3 Low Peak Temperature -25 and -30°C
4 Dwell Time* 4 hours
5 Ramp Cycles 10°C/minute
6 Cycles 2
Table E8-4. Thermal Cycling
No. Description Time
1 Room temperature (20°C) decrease to low peak temperature (-25°C) 4.5 minutes
2 Dwell at low peak temperature 4 hours
3 Low peak temperature (-25°C) increase to high peak temperature (70°C) 9.5 minutes
4 Dwell at high peak temperature 4 hours
5 High peak temperature (70°C) decrease to low peak temperature (-30°C) 10 minutes
6 Dwell at low peak temperature 4 hours
7 Low peak temperature (-30°C) increase to high peak temperature (70°C) 10 minutes
8 Dwell at high peak temperature 4 hours
9 High peak temperature (70°C) decrease to room temperature (20°C) 5 minutes
- Total time 16 hours 39 minutes
Table E8-5. Thermal Cycling

Over Testing Procedures

No. Test Time
1 First Sine About 15 minutes
2 First Random About 20 minutes
3 Thermal About 16 hours 41 minutes
4 Second Sine About 15 minutes
5 Second Random About 20 minutes
Table E8-6. Over Testing Procedures

Total: about 2 days

Appendix E9: Simulations

Static

Required Profile:

Static Profile

Fig E9-1. Static Profile

Axial: 1.25 * 8.5g

Static Profile Axial

Fig E9-2. Static Profile Axial

Lateral: 1.25 * 3g

Static Profile Lateral

Fig E9-3. Static Profile Lateral

Static Profile Lateral

Fig E9-4. Static Profile Lateral

Sine Frequency

Find the resonance frequency

Sine Frequency

Fig E9-5. Sine Frequency

Sine Frequency

Fig E9-6. Sine Frequency

Thermal

Check for overheating

Thermal Simulation

Fig E9-7. Thermal Simulation

Appendix E10: Test Results

Vibration results before thermal cycle: Link

Thermal cycle data: Link

Vibration results after thermal cycle: Link

Appendix E11: Usable area of PCB and Size of Components

Item Dimensions (mm by mm) Area (mm^2) Usable Height (mm)
PCB 94.39 x 90.33 8526.25 -
Usable PCB Plate (Inner Side) 70.75 x 57.79 4088.64 20mm
Usable PCB Plate (Outer Side) 70.75 x 57.79 4088.64 3mm
Pin Stack 2.5 x 2.5 6.25 3mm
Table E11-1. PCB Size
Item Dimensions (mm by mm) Area (mm^2) Height (mm)
Z-SOM 68.00 x 45.00 3060.00 3.00
AT-Mega 10.00 x 10.00 100.00 2.00
GM Tube 49.20 x 15.10 742.92 15.10
HV Converter 28.00 x 15.00 420.00 8.00
Table E11-2. Component Size

Copyright © 2025 Richard Loong

Page last modified: 5 Apr 2025.